I am not completely appalled or hysterical with these pictures. Glee is a teen show with audiences ranging from age fifteen to fifty. From viewing the pictures it shows nothing offensive on my end as many more magazines have raunchier photos of younger celebrities. I think parents are upset because they expect or perceive the cast members on how they see them in television and not in real life. In the television they see the members as goal reaching teenagers that have a love for singing, but in reality the cast members are in their early to mid-20s (Finn Hudson is 28). People! They have a life of their own. A REAL life! Actors and actresses don’t act for free! We live in America and believe it or not it is a capitalist country! We make money where it can be made to support our spending habits and standard of living while standing by our moral codes. Stripping to my underwear and posing for a magazine making a few hundred thousand is not against my moral code. In my opinion if the parents who are complaining have the body and finesse as the Glee cast members they would probably do the same thing for a few hundred thousand dollars (they would probably do it for less). There are many controversial pictures I would agree with such as Miley Cyrus doing racy photos at the age of fifteen, at that age a person is still finding themselves and experiencing body changes and NOT LEGAL! Her audiences ranged from age eight to fifteen, parents definitely had the right to complain about that dilemma. As far as the glee cast complaints, sorry! Parents do not have the right to complain about any of it since the target audience is aimed at an older age group. If you don’t like it; turn off your DVR, cancel your cable, and donate your Glee CDs to me. Land of the free! It’s your choice, not your choice to choose theirs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Everyone knows sex sells. Who care? Parents let their children watch the damn show and if it was that damn bad, the network wouldnt have aired it.
ReplyDelete